Why people don’t get Nate Silver

stefanjbecket:

Probability is counterintuitive.

The idea that the chance of something happening doesn’t change is hard for us to wrap our heads around. Understandably so—if I tell you that you have a 70 percent chance of making a putt, most people would expect that after ten putts, seven will have gone in the hole. This, however, is not the case. 

That’s what’s hard to grasp about probability, the idea that one result has no effect on what happens in the future.

Read More

Related to this great piece (a topic which Stefan totally beat me to, because I had a half-written, not-as-good take hiding in my drafts) is the rebuke he got from his public editor on Thursday. If you ask me, the New York Times’ public editor, Margaret Sullivan, totally should have run a statistical model on whether that column was a good idea.

— Ernie @ ShortFormBlog

106 Notes/ Hide

  1. telecoms-evolution reblogged this from stefanjbecket
  2. maloqueiro-sem-sentido reblogged this from election
  3. zoefame reblogged this from sliverdemon
  4. sliverdemon reblogged this from shortformblog
  5. takeyourtime-cominghome reblogged this from election
  6. huggs-boson reblogged this from shortformblog
  7. apocalypsesunshine reblogged this from shortformblog
  8. ohheybill reblogged this from shortformblog and added:
    Haha shortformblog adds commentary for their post on the election tumblr, then reblogs their own post and has to add...
  9. made-of-nguyen reblogged this from election
  10. maequerida reblogged this from election
  11. poodles reblogged this from shortformblog
  12. albertis reblogged this from shortformblog and added:
    Nate Silver rules.
  13. myudderblog reblogged this from shortformblog
  14. joemajesty reblogged this from election
  15. sakanarochan reblogged this from themattsmith